fm215+Arugumentiative+Essay

=Dear Producer,=

=In our class, we read the book //Island of the Blue Dolphins,// we also watched the movie and noticed several differences between the two. Compare the two of them and compare the main details from the book to the movie. The movie can be way more interesting if you added the three main parts in the book.=

=One problem is that the director forgot the main parts of the book, for example the devilfish scene, the sea elephant battle, and the tsunami. I think the director added those scenes it would've been an awesome action movie in 1964.=

=Another problem was the casting. In the movie the director should have made Karana look like she is actually 12 years old and then they should've made her look older at the end of the movie. Also, they should have made Rontu look like a wolf not a German Shepard. One last reason is to add Ulape and Nanko to the movie and also make Ramo live longer.=

=Since technology has upgraded in the 1960's. This movie should've been longer and better. The director should've added a better setting. For example, in the movie they should have made the cave look like a cave. Another one is the devilfish. More special effects.=

=In the movie //Island of the Blue Dolphins// the director should have made the movie truer to the book. For example, directors should've added a voice over like Karana being the narrator while she doing the action while shes narrating. Also, the crew should've added more exciting parts form the book.=

=Even though the movie may not have enough details from the book, but I believe that the directors and the casting can make the movie 10x more better than it was before in 1964.=